Top 5 Explosive Revelations from Michael Cohen’s Testimony on Donald Trump Hearing

This week, Michael Cohen, who used to work as Donald Trump’s lawyer and problem solver, was in court in Manhattan for Trump’s hush money trial. Cohen said some surprising things during his testimony on Donald Trump.

Cohen used to be a strong supporter of Trump, but now he become a fierce critic. He said he wants Trump to suffer for what he did to him during an episode of his podcast in October 2023. Which played in court this Thursday.

Cohen got sentence to three years in prison in 2018 because he admitted to doing several illegal things. As like breaking campaign finance laws and lying to Congress. He said he did these things to help Trump.

Trump says he didn’t do anything wrong. He said “not guilty” to 34 charges of making false business records. Prosecutors say he did this to hide the fact that he paid $130,000 to Stormy Daniels, who used to be a porn star, before the 2016 election. They say he did this to keep her quiet about something.

Trump, who used to be president and expected to run for president again in 2024, says he didn’t break any laws. He also says he didn’t have a relationship with Daniels back in 2006, despite what she says.

Newsweek made a list of the five most surprising things that came out during Cohen’s testimony on Donald Trump. They tried to get a response from Trump’s lawyer and his team for their thoughts. Even emailing them outside of regular work hours. This shows they’re serious about getting all sides of the story. It’s important for news outlets to reach out to everyone involved, especially in big stories like this.

Trump Signed Off on Daniels’ Payment:

During his testimony on Tuesday, Cohen revealed that Trump himself gave the green light to a reimbursement plan for the payment made to Daniels. This reimbursement plan totaled $420,000 spread out over a year.

The amount was increased for tax reasons and to cover additional expenses, according to Cohen. This insight sheds light on Trump’s direct involvement in the financial arrangements surrounding the Daniels affair. Which adding another layer to the ongoing legal saga.

During a meeting that involved Michael Cohen, Donald Trump, and Allen Weisselberg. Who was the Trump Organization’s chief financial officer at the time (and is now serving time for perjury). Cohen revealed that Trump personally approved the reimbursement plan for the payment to Stormy Daniels.

This payment totaled $420,000 spread over 12 months, with the sum increased for tax reasons and to cover additional expenses.

When asked by a prosecuting attorney what Trump said during that meeting, Cohen stated that Trump “approved it.” This admission provides further evidence of Trump’s direct involvement in the financial arrangements related to the payment to Daniels.

Cohen’s testimony on Donald Trump sheds light on the inner workings of the Trump Organization and adds weight to ongoing legal discussions about Trump’s actions. This revelation could have significant implications for the legal proceedings surrounding Trump and the allegations against him.

During Monday’s court session, prosecutors presented a bank statement from Michael Cohen’s account at First Republic Bank. The statement revealed a $130,000 wire transfer to Stormy Daniels’ attorney just before the 2016 election, as per prosecutors’ claims. Additionally, the statement contained handwritten notes attributed to Allen Weisselberg. Which outlining a plan for Cohen to be reimbursed through monthly payments of $35,000.

Norm Eisen, a lawyer who previously served as counsel to the House Judiciary Committee. During Trump’s first impeachment trial, commented on the significance of this bank statement. He described it as “perhaps the most important document in the case” in a post on X. Which emphasizing its potential impact on the ongoing legal proceedings.

This revelation underscores the intricate financial arrangements surrounding the payment to Daniels and implicates Weisselberg. Further intensifying scrutiny on the matter. The emergence of such evidence could significantly shape the trajectory of the case against Trump and those involved.

Trump Tape Exposed:

During court proceedings, an alleged secret recording made by Michael Cohen of Donald Trump before the 2016 presidential election surfaced. In the recording, Trump seemed to be aware of plans to pay $150,000 to prevent the publication of a story involving Playboy model Karen McDougal. McDougal claimed in 2018 that she had an affair with Trump, a claim strongly denied by him.

Cohen stated that he recorded the conversation to assure National Enquirer publisher David Pecker. That he would be reimbursed for the $150,000 payment made to McDougal in exchange for her silence about the alleged affair.

In the recording, Trump is heard asking Cohen, “so what do we got to pay for this? One-fifty?” Additionally, Cohen allegedly advises Trump on the necessity of establishing a front company to facilitate reimbursement to the publisher.

This revelation unveils intricate details of the efforts made to silence potential damaging stories about Trump’s personal life during the election campaign. The emergence of such recordings adds another layer to the ongoing legal scrutiny surrounding Trump. And his associates, potentially shaping the course of future proceedings.

Melania Trump’s Defense, ‘Locker Room Talk’:

Cohen revealed that Melania Trump was the one who proposed the “locker room talk” defense regarding her husband’s controversial comments on the Access Hollywood tape. Which surfaced just before the 2016 election. The video, recorded in 2005, captured Trump making lewd remarks,” suggesting that being a celebrity allowed such behavior.

Melania’s suggestion of “locker room talk” as a defense implies an attempt to downplay the seriousness of Trump’s remarks. By portraying them as casual banter rather than reflective of his character or conduct.

This revelation adds insight into the strategic responses employed by the Trump campaign to mitigate the fallout from the Access Hollywood tape.

By attributing the defense strategy to Melania, Cohen’s testimony on Donald Trump provides a glimpse into the dynamics. Within the Trump camp during a critical moment in the presidential campaign.

The emergence of this detail contributes to the ongoing public discourse surrounding Trump’s behavior and the reactions of those closest to him.

According to Cohen, Trump instructed him to portray his remarks on the Access Hollywood tape as “locker room talk,” a phrase Melania Trump reportedly suggested or endorsed.

This directive aimed to mitigate the fallout from the tape’s release, which occurred shortly before the 2016 election. Trump sought to frame the comments as commonplace banter rather than indicative of his character or actions.

By adopting Melania’s suggestion, Trump aimed to assert control over the narrative surrounding the tape and diminish its impact on his presidential campaign. Cohen’s testimony sheds light on the strategic efforts made by the Trump team to manage the fallout from controversial incidents.

The revelation of Melania’s involvement in crafting the defense strategy offers insight into her role within the Trump campaign and her approach to managing crises. It underscores the collaborative nature of decision-making within Trump’s inner circle during crucial moments in the election cycle.

Overall, Cohen’s testimony on Donald Trump provides valuable context regarding the response to the Access Hollywood tape and highlights the tactics employed by the Trump campaign to address damaging revelations. This detail adds depth to the ongoing discussion surrounding Trump’s conduct and the efforts to mitigate its political ramifications.

Cohen Faces Setback, Knees Chopped Out:

During Thursday’s proceedings, Cohen faced scrutiny from Trump’s attorney, Todd Blanche, regarding his assertion that on October 24, 2016. He conversed with Trump using the phone of Keith Schiller, Trump’s bodyguard at the time. This conversation allegedly revolved around resolving the Stormy Daniels situation.

Blanche contested Cohen’s claim, asserting that Cohen only spoke with Schiller, not Trump, and that their discussion pertained to an unrelated matter. This exchange highlights a key point of contention in Cohen’s testimony, raising doubts about the accuracy of his recollection and the extent of his direct communication with Trump regarding the Daniels affair.

The dispute underscores the importance of corroborating evidence and witness testimony in legal proceedings, particularly in cases involving conflicting accounts of events.

As Cohen’s credibility comes under scrutiny, the reliability of his testimony regarding Trump’s involvement in the Daniels affair becomes a focal point of the trial.